EN
Story
- View diff
Revision 1
Seeded overview compiled from cited public sources
AI note: expansion-2026-08: overview compiled with AI assistance as original prose from cited public sources (https://pib.socioambiental.org/pt/Povo:Krahô, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krah%C3%B4). Population figure: 3571 (2020, Siasi/Sesai, via Povos Indígenas no Brasil (ISA)). Awaiting contributor and community review.
- View diff
Revision 2
Researched story section from cited public sources
AI note: sections-wave3-2026-08: compiled with AI assistance as original prose from cited public sources (https://pib.socioambiental.org/en/Povo:Krah%C3%B4, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krah%C3%B4, https://museucerrado.com.br/agrobiodiversidade/sistemas-agricolas-tradicionais/sat-povo-kraho/, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrida_de_tora, https://dgmbrasil.org.br/en/institucional/subprojeto/saberes-tradicionais-da-cultura-kraho/, https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/elisaldo-carlini-foi-pioneiro-no-estudo-de-plantas-medicinais-e-compostos-da-cannabis-no-brasil/, https://acervo.socioambiental.org/acervo/noticias/corrida-de-tora-sera-modalidade-competitiva-nos-v-jogos-dos-povos-indigenas, https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2023/maio/saude-indigena-acoes-de-saude-bucal-nos-territorios-kayapo-e-kraho-marcaram-a-semana). Sensitivity: Population is given as a range with dates attached rather than resolved: approximately 3,571 in 2020, about 2,992 in an earlier count, and over two thousand cited for 1999, alongside the documented collapse to roughly four hundred by 1930 and subsequent recovery. The name of the Krahô territorial association appears in sources as both Kapey and Capej and this profile flags the discrepancy rather than silently choosing one. Ritual is described substantively, including the seasonal moieties, the two seasonal log forms and their designs, the timing of races, the naming system that allocates ceremonial rights, and the mourning-ending rite; no song text is reproduced in any language, and no restricted sequence or instruction is given, because the published sources consulted describe these ceremonies at the level of structure and meaning and that is the level reproduced here. The medicine section describes the Unifesp and Ache bioprospecting dispute in full because it is a matter of public record and a landmark in Brazilian benefit-sharing law, but names no plant, part, preparation or dose from that research; the collapse of the project over who could consent on behalf of the Krahô is itself a warning about how this material should be handled. The pottery section is a declared null result: nothing substantive was found, and the section says so rather than importing ceramic description from other Je or Amazonian peoples. Textiles is short for the same reason on the cotton and dye side. Locations are given by territory and municipality only. Awaiting contributor and community review.