ES
Historia
- Ver diferencias
Revisión 1
Story section restored from the recorded overview
Nota de IA: rebuild-repair: this people had a culture record and an overview but no page section, because migration 024 attaches a revision to a section it assumes already exists. Content is the same researched overview prose, unchanged.
- Ver diferencias
Revisión 2
Researched story section from cited public sources
Nota de IA: rebuild-repair-citations: the restored story section carried no source paragraph. Same prose, with the sources the overview was researched from appended, as a new revision because section history is append-only.
- Ver diferencias
Revisión 3
Restored Spanish diacritics and eñe stripped at load time
Nota de IA: audit-fix: these Spanish sections were loaded through a path that stripped every accent and every eñe, so the entire Spanish half of eleven profiles read as unaccented text. This revision restores diacritics by rule, applied ONLY to words whose unaccented spelling is not itself a valid Spanish word — so no meaning is guessed at. Genuinely ambiguous pairs (esta/está, mas/más, aun/aún, solo/sólo, termino/término/terminó, publico/público/publicó, practica/práctica) are deliberately left untouched and still need a human pass. Source blocks containing URLs were skipped entirely so that citations stay byte-exact. No wording, fact or figure was changed.
- Ver diferencias
Revisión 4
Accented terms that are unambiguous once anchored to a determiner
Nota de IA: audit-fix, follow-up to the diacritics restoration: termino and practica are ambiguous as bare words (noun or conjugated verb) and were left alone in the first pass. Following a determiner, or in the plural terminos, only the noun reading is possible, so those instances can be accented safely. Bare ambiguous forms remain untouched and still want a human read.